AIRAAI Readiness & Risk

AIRA › AI Laws and Deadlines Tracker

Updated November 12, 2026 · by Scott Walker

AI laws and deadlines tracker, 2026–2028

The EU and Colorado gave organizations more time in 2026. The customers, insurers and boards that fund and oversee you are asking for AI governance evidence today. Here's which rules apply now, which are coming, and what each one asks of you.

In effect now

RuleSinceWhat it asks of you
EU AI Act, Article 50 and general-purpose AI rulesAug 2, 2026Transparency duties: chatbot and generative AI disclosure applies now, along with general-purpose AI model rules.
Texas TRAIGAJan 1, 2026Disclosure and prohibited-use duties for Texas operations. Documented alignment with the NIST AI RMF supports an affirmative defense.
NYC Local Law 144In effectAnnual bias audits for automated hiring tools.

Coming next

RuleDateWhat it asks of you
Colorado SB 26-189Jan 1, 2027Replaces the Colorado AI Act, covering automated decisions in employment, housing, lending and insurance.
California CCPA automated-decision rulesJan 1, 2027Notices, opt-outs and documented risk assessments for significant automated decisions. Risk assessments due by Dec 31, 2027.
EU AI Act, Annex III high-riskDec 2, 2027High-risk obligations for hiring, credit and education systems, after the Digital Omnibus delay.
EU AI Act, Annex I high-riskAug 2, 2028High-risk duties for AI in regulated products such as medical devices and machinery.

Voluntary, but increasingly required by buyers

StandardStatusWhy it matters
ISO/IEC 42001VoluntaryIncreasingly a procurement checkbox. Certification body accreditation under ISO/IEC 42006 is rolling out.
NIST AI RMF 1.0VoluntaryThe U.S. reference framework for AI risk, and the basis of the Texas TRAIGA affirmative defense.

Who's asking, even before the deadlines

  • Customers: procurement sends AI questionnaires and asks for ISO 42001 status before signing.
  • Insurers: underwriters ask how AI decisions are controlled, tested and monitored.
  • Regulators: fair lending, consumer protection and privacy rules already apply to AI decisions.
  • Boards: directors are expected to show oversight of AI risk they can evidence.
  • Your own staff: IBM's 2025 breach study found 1 in 5 organizations had a breach tied to unapproved "shadow" AI. You can't govern AI you haven't found.

Which of these apply to your AI?

An AI Risk Snapshot ($7,500, two weeks) inventories your AI systems, tiers their risk and maps the rules that apply, with a one-page governance summary you can attach to questionnaires.

Dates as of November 2026. We track changes monthly and confirm each date against the official text before it goes in a client report. This page identifies obligations; it is not legal advice. Your counsel decides how to interpret and act on them.